Email: info@ijps.in | Mob: +91-9555269393

Submit Manuscript

Abstract

Exploring the Factors Influencing Information Technology Adoption in Manufacturing Economies During Conflict: Evidence from Iraq's Manufacturing Sector

Hayder Adil Abdul Raheem

Al- Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq, College of Business Economics, Department of Economics of Investment and Business Management

Mortada Mohsen Taher Al-Taie

Al- Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq, College of Business Economics, Department of Economics of Investment and Business Management

257 - 270
Vol.21, Issue 1, Jan-Jun, 2026
Receiving Date: 2026-04-09
Acceptance Date: 2026-04-30
Publication Date: 2026-05-08
Download PDF

http://doi.org/10.37648/ijps.v21i01.018

Abstract

Background: Background in Information technology (IT) integration is still unexplored as it adds to manufacturing performance in the post-conflict emergent economies. Iraq is a unique situation: though with the fifth-largest known oil deposits in the world and the long-established industrial infrastructure Iraq has historically been a manufacturing nation, the 4-decade war and the resulting institutional instability after the war in 2003 severely affected the manufacturing industry. These institutional features make traditional IT-adoption models, which were designed to work in stable institutional settings somewhat inapplicable in this case.


Keywords: IT Adoption; Relative Advantage; Technology Compatibility; Technology Complexity; PLS-SEM; Iraqi Manufacturing; Post-Conflict Economy; Manufacturing Performance; SMEs; DOI Theory


References
  1. Awa, H. O., Ojiabo, O. U., & Orokor, L. E. (2017). Integrated technology-organization-environment (T-O-E) taxonomies for technology adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(6), 893–921. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2016-0079.
  2. Battistoni, E., Gitto, S., Murgia, G., & Campisi, D. (2023). Adoption paths of digital transformation in manufacturing SME. International Journal of Production Economics, 255, 108675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108675.
  3. Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021). Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880.
  4. Dalenogare, L. S., Benitez, G. B., Ayala, N. F., & Frank, A. G. (2018). The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019.
  5. Ekeoma, B. C., Ihechere, A. O., Idemudia, C., Olorunfemi, O. D., & Usman, F. O. (2024). Information technology adoption and small and medium enterprise performance: Does IT adoption reduce rural penalty in emerging and developing countries? Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 90(3), e12325. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12325.
  6. Ghobakhloo, M., & Iranmanesh, M. (2021). Digital transformation success under Industry 4.0: A strategic guideline for manufacturing SMEs. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(8), 1533–1556. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-11-2020-0455.
  7. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  8. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8.
  9. Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101.
  10. Li, L. X., Ye, F., Zhan, Y. Z., Kumar, A., Schiavone, F., & Li, Y. N. (2022). Unraveling the performance puzzle of digitalization: Evidence from manufacturing firms. Journal of Business Research, 149, 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.028.
  11. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114.
  12. Moeuf, A., Pellerin, R., Lamouri, S., Tamayo-Giraldo, S., & Barbaray, R. (2020). The industrial management of SMEs in the era of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 58(5), 1696–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1636323.
  13. Nekmahmud, M., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2023). Digital technology adoption in SMEs: What technological, environmental and organizational factors influence in emerging countries? Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(2), 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221137199.
  14. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
  15. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452.
  16. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
  17. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2022). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  18. Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Ting, H., Vaithilingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing, 53(11), 2322–2347. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0189.
  19. Singh, T., & Garg, S. K. (2021). An extended technology-organization-environment framework to investigate smart manufacturing system implementation in small and medium enterprises. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 163, 107865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107865.
  20. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2.
  21. Vu, N. H., & Nguyen, N. M. (2022). Development of small-and medium-sized enterprises through information technology adoption persistence in Vietnam. Information Technology for Development, 28(4), 585–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1988694.
  22. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207.
  23. Zhang, J., & Li, H. (2022). The impact of big data management capabilities on the performance of manufacturing firms in Asian economy during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 833026. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833026.
  24. Zheng, T., Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., & Perona, M. (2021). The applications of Industry 4.0 technologies in manufacturing context: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 59(6), 1922–1954. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1824085.
  25. Zhou, B., & Zheng, L. (2023). Technology-pushed, market-pulled, or government-driven? The adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies in a developing economy. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(9), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-09-2022-0313.
Back
ELANG212
CLAN4D
VIRAL88
viral88 login link alternatif
VIRAL88
ELANG212
SUPERJP
ELANG212
SUPERJP
BOOSTERJP
BOOSTERJP
PAKONG86
winstrike69 link alternatif
BOOSTERJP
WINSTRIKE69
SLOT GACOR
VIRAL4D
WINSTRIKE69
VIRAL88
WINSTRIKE69
viral88
WINSTRIKE69
WINSTRIKE69
CLAN4D
SAMSONBET86
winstrike69
winstreak 69
winstreak69
winstrik69
winstrike 69
winstreak 69 login
linabet69
linabet69
gojekpot
gojekpot