Email: info@ijps.in | Mob: +91-9555269393

Submit Manuscript

Abstract

Theoretical Contributions of Political Science to Policy Analysis and Policy Orientation

Dr. P. Sujatha

Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Government Degree College, Patancheru

1 - 4
Vol.21, Special Issue 4, 2026
Receiving Date: 2026-02-28
Acceptance Date: 2026-04-02
Publication Date: 2026-04-17
Download PDF

http://doi.org/10.37648/ijps.v21i04.001

Abstract

This paper examines the profound theoretical contributions of political science to the field of policy analysis, highlighting how political theories and frameworks shape the understanding, formulation, and evaluation of public policies. Political science provides critical insights into the nature of power, the behaviour of political actors, institutional dynamics, and the processes of decision-making that underpin policy development. Key theoretical approaches — such as institutionalism, rational choice theory, pluralism, elite theory, and the advocacy coalition framework — offer diverse lenses through which to analyse policy processes, stakeholder interactions, and the influence of political ideologies.


Keywords: Political Science; Theoretical Framework; Policy; Analysis; Orientation; Integration


References
  1. Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
  2. Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford University Press.
  3. Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 3–37). Cambridge University Press.
  4. Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The policy orientation. In D. Lerner & H. D. Lasswell (Eds.), The policy sciences: Recent developments in scope and method (pp. 3–15). Stanford University Press.
  5. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Longman.
  6. Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press.
  7. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.
  9. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
  10. Allison, G. T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Little, Brown and Company.
  11. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational. John Wiley & Sons.
  12. Schelling, T. C. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Harvard University Press.
  13. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
  14. Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, state, and utopia. Basic Books.
  15. Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. University of California Press.
  16. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (W. Rehg, Trans.). MIT Press.
Back
ELANG212
CLAN4D
VIRAL88
viral88 login link alternatif
VIRAL88
ELANG212
SUPERJP
ELANG212
SUPERJP
BOOSTERJP
BOOSTERJP
PAKONG86
winstrike69 link alternatif
BOOSTERJP
WINSTRIKE69
SLOT GACOR
VIRAL4D
WINSTRIKE69
VIRAL88
WINSTRIKE69
viral88
WINSTRIKE69
WINSTRIKE69
CLAN4D
SAMSONBET86
winstrike69
winstreak 69
winstreak69
winstrik69
winstrike 69
winstreak 69 login
linabet69
linabet69
gojekpot
gojekpot
Kerajaanslot