Impact of HDBRTS on Road Congestion, Safety, and Environment
S V Hanagodimath
Assistant Professor, Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research (CMDR), Dharwad, Karnataka, India
Seema Kulkarni
Research Assistant, Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research (CMDR), Dharwad, Karnataka, India
Shweta Neelannavar
Research Assistant, Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research (CMDR), Dharwad, Karnataka, India
Parvati Kalamadi
Research Assistant, Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research (CMDR), Dharwad, Karnataka, India
Laxmi Angadi
Research Assistant, Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research (CMDR), Dharwad, Karnataka, India
Shanta Matapathi
Research Assistant, Centre for Multi-disciplinary Development Research (CMDR), Dharwad, Karnataka, India
Download PDF
http://doi.org/10.37648/ijps.v17i01.027
Abstract
Rapid urbanisation and rising motorisation have intensified challenges related to road congestion, traffic safety, and environmental degradation in medium-sized Indian cities. In this context, Bus Rapid Transit Systems (BRTS) are increasingly promoted as cost-effective and sustainable urban transport solutions. This paper evaluates the impact of the Hubballi–Dharwad Bus Rapid Transit System (HDBRTS), Karnataka’s first BRT initiative, on road congestion, road safety, environmental outcomes, and travel behaviour in the twin cities. The study adopts a mixed-method approach, drawing on primary survey data from 2,064 commuters, twenty-one focus group discussions, stakeholder interviews, and secondary data including traffic accident records for the period 2015–2023. The findings indicate that HDBRTS has contributed significantly to reducing perceived road congestion and private vehicle dependence, with nearly half of the respondents reporting a decline in personal vehicle usage. High levels of user satisfaction, travel time savings, comfort, and cleanliness have encouraged a notable modal shift towards public transport. Environmental assessment reveals that a large majority of commuters perceive HDBRTS as environmentally sustainable, with reported reductions or normalisation of air pollution levels along the corridor. Road safety analysis shows a general decline in total accidents after system implementation, although fatal accidents remain a concern, highlighting the need for stronger enforcement and behavioural interventions. Overall, the study demonstrates that HDBRTS performs strongly on key Bus Rapid Transit performance indicators such as congestion reduction, modal shift, environmental sustainability, and user satisfaction, while showing moderate outcomes in safety improvement. The findings suggest that HDBRTS represents a viable and replicable public transport model for medium-sized Indian cities, provided complementary measures related to enforcement, last-mile connectivity, and integrated mobility planning are strengthened.
Keywords:
Hubballi–Dharwad BRTS; Road Congestion; Road Safety; Environmental Sustainability; Modal Shift; Urban Mobility
References
- Andrew, J., Mfinanga, D. A., & Ochieng, W. Y. (2022). Travel time performance of bus rapid transit and competing modes: Evidence from Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Journal of Transport Geography, 99, Article 103307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103307
- Arolkar, A., Joshi, G., & Kulkarni, P. (2012). Monitoring and accident reduction in Ahmedabad BRTS using wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(3), 1289–1294.
- Babu, S., & Naidu, K. (2017). Issues and challenges of Bus Rapid Transit System in Visakhapatnam city. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 6(5), 227–231.
- Balya, R., Jain, S., & Gupta, P. (2016). Urban congestion, pollution and the role of Bus Rapid Transit System in Indian cities. International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 5(2), 45–52.
- Bhojane, S., & Jain, S. (2016). Road safety audit of Nigadi–Dapodi BRT corridor. International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 4(1), 21–29.
- Guzman, L. A., Oviedo, D., & Rivera, C. (2021). Assessing the impact of Bus Rapid Transit on residential land values: Evidence from Bogotá. Transport Policy, 103, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.006
- Huo, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2022). Identifying user-perceived levels of service for Bus Rapid Transit systems using fuzzy clustering. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 157, 16– 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.004
- Imam, R. (2020). Evaluating low-carbon bus technologies for urban Bus Rapid Transit systems: A case of Amman. Energy Policy, 146, Article 111812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111812
- Jadhav, S., Patil, R., & Kulkarni, A. (2007). Road safety and Bus Rapid Transit concepts in Pune city. Indian Roads Congress Journal, 68(2), 45–56.
- Joshi, R., & Shah, J. (2018). Role of non-motorised transport in enhancing sustainability of Ahmedabad BRT corridor. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(7), 489– 501. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2017.1394528
- Kepaptsoglou, K., Karlaftis, M. G., & Kouridis, C. (2020). Public preferences between Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Transit: Evidence from Multan, Pakistan. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 135, 1– 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.02.013
- Nugroho, S. B., Fujiwara, A., & Zhang, J. (2010). The influence of Bus Rapid Transit corridors on air pollution levels: Evidence from Jakarta. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15(5), 273– 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.02.002
- Pal, S., Roy, S., & Mitra, S. (2018). Performance assessment of Bus Rapid Transit systems in Indian cities. Journal of Urban Transport and Development, 4(1), 33–45.
- Patel, A., Shah, J., & Jain, S. (2015). Walking accessibility to Bus Rapid Transit stations: A case study of Ahmedabad. International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 3(2), 89–97.
- Samerei, S. A., Aghabayk, K., Esmaeili, A., & Shiwakoti, N. (2021). Factors affecting bus rapid transit drivers’ mental health and job satisfaction. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 78, 243– 256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.01.018
- Shah, M., Jain, S., & Parida, M. (2016). Integration of bicycle sharing systems with Bus Rapid Transit corridors: Evidence from Surat, India. Transport Policy, 49, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.05.012
- Sharma, R., & Goliya, H. (2018). User perception and satisfaction of Bus Rapid Transit System: A case study of Indore. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 7(4), 320– 329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2018.03.002
- Tripathy, A., Parida, M., & Jain, S. (2017). Comparative analysis of Bus Rapid Transit systems: Evidence from Bogotá and Ahmedabad. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 143(4), Article 05017015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000408
- Wang, B., Liu, Y., & Zhang, J. (2013). Pedestrian evacuation modelling and safety analysis of Bus Rapid Transit stations: A case study of Guangzhou. Safety Science, 53, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.09.005
