Comparative Study of Solar, Wind, and Biomass Energy Systems
Dr Venkateswarlu Yadavalli
Associate Professor Dept. of Biotechnology Tara Govt. College (A) Sangareddy, T.G.-502001
Download PDF
http://doi.org/10.37648/ijps.v21i02.032
Abstract
The growing global energy demand and environmental concerns have intensified the need for sustainable and renewable energy sources. This study presents a comparative analysis of three major renewable energy systems— solar, wind, and biomass—with respect to their energy conversion efficiency, cost-effectiveness, environmental impact, and suitability for large-scale implementation. Solar energy, derived from photovoltaic and thermal technologies, offers abundant potential in regions with high solar insolation but faces challenges related to intermittency and storage. Wind energy provides a clean and mature technology with relatively low operational costs, though it is limited by geographical and seasonal variability. Biomass energy, on the other hand, offers a consistent and storable source of energy with the added advantage of utilizing agricultural and organic waste, yet it raises concerns regarding land use and emissions during combustion. The comparative evaluation highlights that a hybrid approach integrating solar, wind, and biomass systems can ensure a stable, sustainable, and diversified energy mix. The study underscores the importance of technological innovation, policy support, and regional resource assessment to enhance the efficiency and adoption of renewable energy systems for a sustainable energy future.
Keywords:
Renewable energy; solar energy; Wind energy; Biomass Energy and sustainable energy
References
- Ang, T. Z. (2022). A comprehensive study of renewable energy sources. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 154, Article 111823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.111823
- Bolson, N., Smith, A., & Lee, J. (2022). Capacity factors for electrical power generation from renewable technologies: A global assessment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(30), Article e2205429119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2205429119
- International Energy Agency. (2024). Renewables 2024: Analysis and forecast to 2030. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2024
- International Renewable Energy Agency. (2024). Renewable power generation costs in 2023. https://www.irena.org/publications/2024/Sep/Renewable-Power-Generation-Costs-in-2023
- Luo, J., Wang, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Comparative life cycle assessment of photovoltaic and biomass power generation. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12, Article 1375820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1375820
- Nøland, J. K., Sæther, S., & Alstad, J. (2022). Spatial energy density of large-scale electricity generation: Challenging the consensus on solar power density. Scientific Reports, 12, Article 5539. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25341- 9
- Portillo, F., Martínez, R., & Estevez, L. (2024). Life cycle assessment in renewable energy: Solar and wind comparative study. Environments, 11(7), 147. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11070147
- Rossi, F., Delgado, P., & Chen, M. (2023). Comparative scenario-based life cycle assessment of renewable energy systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 400, Article 136885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136885
- U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2023). Levelized costs of new generation resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2023. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/AEO2023_LCOE_report.pdf
