Multimodality in the Courtroom in American and British Criminal Cases
Dr. Bushra Ni'ma Rashid
College of Education, Ibn Rushd for Human Sciences, The Department of English, Iraq
Download PDF
http://doi.org/10.37648/ijps.v16i01.001
Abstract
The public now has access to cases that were previously solely available to legal professionals in the judicial circle since courtroom discourses (CD) are increasingly being mediated online. The complexity of meaning-building techniques in CD must be analysed using a multimodal approach now that these videotaped trials are available for research and criticism.The sofa couch fabric is comfortable, ultra-soft, and elastic, composed of 92% polyester and 8% spandex. But in court, because of the law, power, culture, society, or other things, the judge may sometimes move away from being neutral, which can lead to judicial injustice. The judge achieves his or her communication goals in the courtroom by controlling the talk in the courtroom. This is the judge's and it directly shows whether the judge stays neutral and makes sure that criminal trials are fair in terms of both the law and the way it is done. This exploratory research aims to provide replica uhren to analyse criminal CD critically, a preliminary theoretical framework for multimodal discourse analysis (MMDA) has been developed. First, we collect the dataset from criminal cases in British and America. If we want to comprehend courtroom interactions in their whole, we must take into account all kinds of communication in the courtroom. The study shows that the relationship between the prosecutor and the defense lawyer in a British and American courtroom is not balanced, which is shown by their use of multimodal discourse (MMD). It also sheds some light on future research in this area and suggests ways to improve how criminal cases use multimodality. With Swiss reliable movements, AAA UK replica omega watches have high quality. Perfect quality rolex replica watches UK are cheap online for men and women.
Keywords:
multimodal discourse analysis (MDA); theoretical framework; criminal courtroom discourses
References
- Ajjawi, R., & Boud, D. (2023). Changing representations of student achievement: The need for innovation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 1-11.https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2192513
- Al-Juboury, M. T., & Saedi, M. A. M. A. (2018). Modernizing Teaching English with Reference to Some of The Traditional Methods. Al-Adab Journal, 2(126), 53-72.https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i126.48
- Al-Waili, S. A., Jassim, A. T. A. H., & Khudha, A. T. B. K. (2018). The Extent of the Arabic language Teachers Practice in the Intermediate Stage for the Modern Teaching Skills from the point of view of the Managers and Supervisors in Iraq. ALUSTATH JOURNAL FOR HUMAN AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 226(3), 361-378.https://doi.org/10.36473/ujhss.v226i3.100
- Chang, C. C. (2023). Enhancing EFL University Students’ Readiness for Learning Academic Content in English: the Effectiveness of Combining MOOCs with Data-Driven Learning Activities in an English Language Classroom. English Teaching & Learning, 1-26.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-023-00139-8
- Feng, D. Zhang, D. and O’Halloran, K. 2014. “Advances and frontiers of multimodal discourse analysis”, Contemporary Linguistics, Vol. 16 (1), pp. 88-99, 2014.
- G. Kress, What is mode?, in C. Jewitt, ed., The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, London: Routledge, pp. 54-67, 2009
- Jewitt, C, J. Bezemer and K. O’Halloran, Introducing Multimodality. London, [England] New York, New York: Routledge, 2016.
- K. O'Halloran, Multimodal analysis video. creativework. Multimodal Analysis Company, 2013.
- Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B., & Trojszczak, M. (Eds.). (2022). Language Use, Education, and Professional Contexts. Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96095-7
- Miyano, K., Shinkuma, R., Shiode, N., Shiode, S., Sato, T. and Oki, E., 2020. Multi-UAV allocation framework for predictive crime deterrence and data acquisition. Internet of Things, 11, p.100205.
- Moore, S., Clayton, A. and Murphy, H., 2021. Seeing justice done: Courtroom filming and the deceptions of transparency. Crime, Media, Culture, 17(1), pp.127-144.
- Najeeb, A. F., & Rezqallah, M. S. (2023). Effective Metadiscourse Strategies in Texts of English and Arabic Trade Agreements to attain persuasion. Journal of the College of Languages (JCL), (47), 104-125.https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2023.0.47.0104
- Nashmi, B. H., & Mehdi, W. S. (2022). A Pragmatic Study of Identity Representation in American Political Speeches. Journal of the College of Education for Women, 33(1), 16-32.https://doi.org/10.36231/coedw.v33i1.1560
- S. Tan, B. A. Smith and K. J. O’Halloran, “Online leadership discourse in higher education: A digital multimodal discourse perspective”, Discourse & Communication, Vol. 9 (5), pp. 559-584, 2015.
- W. Guo, “On the construciton of legal facts in court discourse: A multimodal perspective”, Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, pp. 53-57, 2014 (1).
- Włodarczyk, M., Kopaczyk, J. and Kozak, M., 2020. Multilingualism in Greater Poland court records (1386–1448): tagging discourse boundaries and code-switching. Corpora, 15(3), pp.273-290.
- Yuan, C., 2019. A battlefield or a lecture hall? A contrastive multimodal discourse analysis of courtroom trials. Social Semiotics, 29(5), pp.645-669.
- Zhang, Y. (2021). Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing. Springer Singapore.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3
