Email: info@ijps.in | Mob: +91-9555269393

Submit Manuscript

Abstract

A STUDY ON THE EVIDENTIARY VALUE OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT

Soman P Mamkuttathil

Assistant Professor, Govt. Law College, Thrissur, Kerala.

98 - 109
Vol. 2, Issue 1, Jul-Dec, 2016
Receiving Date: 2016-08-21
Acceptance Date: 2016-10-17
Publication Date: 2016-10-20
Download PDF
Abstract

The statements made to the police are of three categories: 1) A statement which has been recorded as First Information Report. 2) Statement recorded by the police in the course of investigation 3) A statement recorded by the police but not falling under the above (1) and (2) category. None of the above statements can be combined as substantial evidence, that is to say, as evidence of facts there in. Because it is not made during trial, it is not given on oath, nor it is tested by cross examination. Generally FIR has no evidentiary value but in few circumstances it carries evidentiary value, as in the case of dying declaration. FIR cannot be used as substantive piece of evidence. The value of F.I.R must always depend on the facts and circumstances of a given case. First Information Report can only be used to corroborate or to contradict the maker of FIR. It may be utilized by the defence to impeach the credit of the informant under Section 155 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. FIR is the earlier version of the case of prosecution and it must be placed before the judge to weigh the truth or falsity and for corroboration and contradiction of the story of the maker of the information. A First Information Report is not supposed to be a detailed document. FIR is a public document prepared under Section 159 of Cr.PC.


Keywords: First Information Report; Corroboration; Contradictory; Evidentiary value; Statement; Police.


References
  1. Mulla, commentary on the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, Volume 3, Delhi Raw House
  2. Dr. N,V Paranjape, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Central Law Agency
  3. Batuk Lal, The Code of Criminal Procedure, Conbal Law Agency.
  4. Ratanlal and Dheerajlal, Law of Evidence 15th Edition Lexis Nexis.
  5. 2003 Cri. L.J 375 (Pat)
  6. AIR 2007 SC2594
  7. AIR 1972 SC 622
  8. AIR 1957 SC 366
  9. AIR 1952 Cal 621
  10. AIR 1973 SC 476
  11. AIR 1982 SC 1511
  12. AIR 1959 SC 1012
  13. AIR 1976 SC 2304
  14. 1993 Cri LJ 397
  15. 1992 (2) Crimes 253 (Gujarat)
Back
SUPERJP
BOOSTERJP
GOJEKPOT
WINSTRIKE69
winstrike69 login link alternatif
WINSTRIKE69
ELANG212
ELANG212
ELANG212
GORI77
GORI77
CLAN4D
DINAMIT4D
VIRAL88
GORI77
VIRAL88
viral88 login link alternatif
VIRAL88
SAMSONBET86
PAKONG86
WINSTRIKE69
WINSTRIKE69
WINSTRIKE69
winstrike69 link alternatif
LINABET69
BOOSTERJP
WINSTRIKE69
WINSTRIKE69
WINSTRIKE69
akun pro thailand
Paito SDY Lotto
WINSTRIKE69
SLOT GACOR
VIRAL4D
WINSTRIKE69
BOOSTERJP
VIRAL88
GOJEKPOT
GOJEKPOT
GORI77
VIRAL4D
WINSTRIKE69
viral88
WINSTRIKE69
WINSTRIKE69
CLAN4D
WINSTRIKE69
VIRAL88
viral88
boosterjp
VIRAL88
WINSTRIKE69
boosterjp
Winstrike69
winstrike69
SAMSONBET86
winstrike69
winstreak 69
winstreak69
winstrik69
winstrike 69
winstreak 69 login
winstrike69
linabet69
WINSTRIKE69
GORI77
jagoan86
gori77
winstrike69
winstrike69
winstrike69
winstrike69
winstrike69
gori77
winstrike69
pakong86
winstrike69
winstrike69
linabet69
viral88
jagoan86
winstrike69
gori77
linabet69
LINABET69
gori77
winstrike69
gori77
winstrike69
gojekpot
gojekpot
gojekpot
kaptenjackpot
superjp
pakong86