Email: info@ijps.in | Mob: +91-9555269393

Submit Manuscript

Abstract

Diversity in Dying: Funerary Rituals Across Cultures and the Social Utility of Death

Sanjna

Institute of Professional Psychology, Bahria University, Pakistan

104 - 110
Vol.16, Issue 1, Jul-Dec, 2023
Receiving Date: 2023-08-12
Acceptance Date: 2023-09-30
Publication Date: 2023-10-18
Download PDF

http://doi.org/10.37648/ijps.v16i01.010

Abstract

Death is biologically universal, but the social work of death is culturally organized. This narrative review examines funerary rituals as collective responses to mortality, drawing on classical anthropological theory and contemporary scholarship on grief, ritual, and continuing bonds. Rather than treating funerary practices as fixed reflections of belief, the review argues that mortuary rituals repeatedly perform four interconnected functions: marking separation and liminality; reclassifying the dead and reorganizing social relationships; transforming grief through memory, meaning, and continuing bonds; and restoring collective order after the disruption created by death. Comparative cases from European Neandertal archaeology, ancient Egypt, and contemporary Toraja communities illustrate how radically different practices can address related social problems without implying that all cultures share the same beliefs or ritual meanings. The paper proposes a cross-cultural framework for understanding funerary ritual as a form of social repair: death changes biological status immediately, whereas ritual helps communities negotiate the slower transformation of identity, relationship, and belonging.


Keywords: funerary rituals; mortuary practices; grief; liminality; rites of passage; continuing bonds; cultural anthropology; death rituals


References
  1. Adams, K. M. (1993). Club dead, not club med: Staging death in contemporary Tana Toraja (Indonesia). Asian Journal of Social Science, 21(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1163/030382493X00116
  2. Budiman, M. (2013). Contemporary funeral rituals of Sa’dan Toraja: From Aluk Todolo to “new” religions. Karolinum Press
  3. Davies, D. J. (1997). Death, ritual, and belief: The rhetoric of funerary rites. Cassell.
  4. Dibble, H. L., Aldeias, V., Goldberg, P., McPherron, S. P., Sandgathe, D., & Steele, T. E. (2015). A critical look at evidence from La Chapelle-aux-Saints supporting an intentional Neandertal burial. Journal of Archaeological Science, 53, 649–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.04.019
  5. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  6. Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press.
  7. Field, N. P., Gao, B., & Paderna, L. (2005). Continuing bonds in bereavement: An attachment theory based perspective. Death Studies, 29(4), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180590923689
  8. Hallam, E., Hockey, J., & Katz, J. (2020). Culture and grief: Ethnographic perspectives on ritual, relationships and remembering. Death Studies, 44(10), 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2020.1851885
  9. Hertz, R. (1960). Death and the right hand (R. Needham & C. Needham, Trans.). Free Press.
  10. Hewson, H., Galbraith, N., Jones, C., & Heath, G. (2024). The impact of continuing bonds following bereavement: A systematic review. Death Studies, 48(10), 1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2023.2223593
  11. Metcalf, P., & Huntington, R. (1991). Celebrations of death: The anthropology of mortuary ritual (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  12. Rendu, W., Beauval, C., Crevecoeur, I., Bayle, P., Balzeau, A., Bismuth, T., Bourguignon, L., Delfour, G., Faivre, J.- P., Lacrampe-Cuyaubère, F., Tavormina, C., Todisco, D., Turq, A., & Maureille, B. (2014). Evidence supporting an intentional Neandertal burial at La Chapelle-aux-Saints. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(1), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316780110
  13. Seiler, R., & Rühli, F. J. (2015). “The opening of the mouth”—A new perspective for an ancient Egyptian mummification procedure. The Anatomical Record, 298(6), 1208–1216. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.23140
  14. Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (2005). To continue or relinquish bonds: A review of consequences for the bereaved. Death Studies, 29(6), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481180590962659
  15. Tsintjilonis, D. (2000). Death and the sacrifice of signs: “Measuring” the dead in Tana Toraja. Oceania, 71, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4461.2000.tb02720.x
  16. Turner, V. W. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine Publishing Company.
  17. van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage (M. B. Vizedom & G. L. Caffee, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1909.)
Back
ELANG212
CLAN4D
VIRAL88
viral88 login link alternatif
VIRAL88
ELANG212
SUPERJP
ELANG212
SUPERJP
BOOSTERJP
BOOSTERJP
PAKONG86
winstrike69 link alternatif
BOOSTERJP
WINSTRIKE69
SLOT GACOR
VIRAL4D
WINSTRIKE69
VIRAL88
WINSTRIKE69
viral88
WINSTRIKE69
WINSTRIKE69
CLAN4D
SAMSONBET86
winstrike69
winstreak 69
winstreak69
winstrik69
winstrike 69
winstreak 69 login
linabet69
linabet69
gojekpot
gojekpot